Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 2-3-6 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 2-3-6 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 2-3-6

TITLE 2 AGRICULTURE

Section 3. Georgia Agricultural Exposition Authority, 2-3-1 through 2-3-15.

2-3-6. Public purpose of authority; tax and assessment exemptions.

It is found, determined, and declared that the creation of the authority and the carrying out of its corporate purposes are in all respects for the benefit of the people of this state and constitute a public purpose and that the authority will be performing an essential governmental function in the exercise of the powers conferred upon it by this chapter. The State of Georgia covenants that the authority shall be required to pay no taxes or assessments upon any of the property acquired by it or under its jurisdiction, control, possession, or supervision or upon its activities in the operation or maintenance of the facilities erected, maintained, or acquired by it or any fees, rentals, or other charges for the use of such facilities or other income received by the authority; provided, however, in no event shall the exemptions granted in this Code section extend to any lessee or other private person or entity.

(Code 1981, §12-3-475, enacted by Ga. L. 1985, p. 801, § 1; Code 1981, §2-3-6, as redesignated by Ga. L. 2011, p. 261, § 4/HB 125.)

Code Commission notes.

- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2011, "this chapter" was substituted for "this part" at the end of the first sentence.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 2-3-6 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 12

Post v. State v. State v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-11-16

Citation: 298 Ga. 241, 779 S.E.2d 624

Snippet: judges in the circuit. See USCR 25.4 (C) (2), (3). 6 Post filed and purported to join other

Thompson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-04-22

Citation: 295 Ga. 96, 757 S.E.2d 846, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 1175, 2014 WL 1588478, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 296

Snippet: delusional insanity”); Studstill v. State, 7 Ga. 2, 3 [6] (1849) (“It is not *100competent to prove that

Cook v. NC Two, L.P.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-07-05

Citation: 712 S.E.2d 831, 289 Ga. 462, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 2055, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 542

Snippet: of serving the garnishee. OCGA § 18-4-64(a) (2), (3), (6), (7).[2] When a plaintiff in garnishment opts

R AND J MURRAY, LLC v. Murray County

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-11-21

Citation: 653 S.E.2d 720, 282 Ga. 740, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 3595, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 858

Snippet: [Georgia's] environment." DCA Rule 110-4-3-.03(2), (3). [6] Although a local government may consider "the

Cohen v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2002-09-30

Citation: 570 S.E.2d 301, 275 Ga. 528, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 2823, 2002 Ga. LEXIS 872

Snippet: consecutively to the sentence on Count (5). Counts (2), (3), (6), and (7) were vacated by operation of law. See

Heublein, Inc. v. State of Ga.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1987-01-07

Citation: 351 S.E.2d 190, 256 Ga. 578, 1987 Ga. LEXIS 523

Snippet: final delivery into this state. OCGA §§ 3-4-60 (2); 3-6-50 (b). Heublein argues that this import tax violates

Estes v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1974-09-06

Citation: 208 S.E.2d 806, 232 Ga. 703, 1974 Ga. LEXIS 1063

Snippet: This was not done here. 4. Enumerations of error 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 12 relate to the admissibility

Johnson v. Smith

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1971-05-06

Citation: 182 S.E.2d 101, 227 Ga. 611, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 796

Snippet: habeas corpus proceeding. 5. Enumerated errors 2, 3, 6, 7, and 10 complain of errors in the trial of the

Miller v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1968-09-24

Citation: 163 S.E.2d 730, 224 Ga. 627, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 876

Snippet: overruling motion for a new trial. Amended grounds 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 12 assert that the trial court

Griffin v. Lynn

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1958-07-11

Citation: 214 Ga. 300, 104 S.E.2d 442, 1958 Ga. LEXIS 405

Snippet: prejudiced thereby. Brewer v. Williams, 210 Ga. 341 (2, 3, 6) (80 S. E. 2d 190). The defendant has the right

Mankin v. Bryant

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1949-11-14

Citation: 56 S.E.2d 447, 206 Ga. 120

Snippet: To the judgment of the court overruling grounds 2, 3, 6, and 7 of the demurrer, the defendants duly excepted

Carter v. Johnson

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1923-09-06

Citation: 156 Ga. 207, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 228, 119 S.E. 22

Snippet: Atkinson, J. (1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8). The rulings announced in the first, second, third, sixth, seventh,