O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 20-2-1183 (2019)

Written agreement for law enforcement officers in schools

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When a local school system assigns or employs law enforcement officers in schools, the local board of education shall have a collaborative written agreement with law enforcement officials to establish the role of law enforcement and school employees in school disciplinary matters and ensure coordination and cooperation among officials, agencies, and programs involved in school discipline and public protection.

History

Code 1981, § 20-2-1183, enacted by Ga. L. 2016, p. 443, § 3-3/SB 367.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. Former Code Section 20-2-1183, relating to possession of electronic communication devices in school, was repealed and reserved by Ga. L. 2012, p. 358, § 39/HB 706 and Ga. L. 2012, p. 893, § 8/SB 289,

effective July 1, 2012. The former Code section was based on Code 1981, § 20-21183, enacted by Ga. L. 1989, p. 1394, § 2; Ga. L. 2000, p. 618, § 73; Ga. L. 2003, p. 307, § 1. Law reviews. For article on the 2016 amendment of this Code section, see 33 Georgia St. U. L. Rev. 139 (2016).

ELEMENTARY & SECONDARY EDUC.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2018–2018 · leading case: Hines v. Jefferson, 338 F. Supp. 3d 1288 (N.D. Ga. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Hines v. Jefferson, 338 F. Supp. 3d 1288 (N.D. Ga. 2018). · cites it 6× “124 Hines also contends that the contract violates O.C.G.A. § 20-2-1183, which provides that a local school board must have a "collaborative written agreement" with law enforcement officials when it assigns law enforcement officers in its schools to establish the roles of the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.