O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 20-2-273 (2019)

Agency directors and staff

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Each board of control shall appoint and contract with a director who shall be the executive officer of the regional educational service agency. The director shall be responsible for the administration of programs and services approved by the board of control, including the Georgia Learning Resources System, except for those under contract with a local board of education serving as fiscal agents for the Georgia Learning Resources System.

(b) The regional educational service agency staff shall consist of those individuals authorized by the board of control to provide the instructional and support services prescribed in this part.

History

Code 1981, § 20-2-273, enacted by Ga. L. 1985, p. 1657, § 1; Ga. L. 1987, p. 1169, § 1; Ga. L. 1995, p. 1340, § 2; Ga. L. 1996, p. 1062, § 1; Ga. L. 2000, p. 618, § 48.

Annotations

Code Commission notes. Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in

1995, “agents” was substituted for “agent” in the last sentence of subsection (a). Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 2000, p. 618, § 1, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: “This Act shall be known and may be cited as the ‘A Plus Education Reform Act of 2000.’”

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2000–2000 · leading case: North Georgia Reg'l Educ. Serv. Agency v. Weaver, 527 S.E.2d 864 (Ga. 2000).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

North Georgia Reg'l Educ. Serv. Agency v. Weaver, 527 S.E.2d 864 (Ga. 2000). · cites it 2× “10 See OCGA § 20-2-273. 11 See OCGA §§ 20-2-272 (e); 20-2-274.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.