O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 21-2-301 (2019)
[Repealed] Pilot program; testing and evaluation of electronic voting systems; creation of Twenty-first Century Voting Commission
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
History
Code 1981, § 21-2-301, enacted by Ga. L. 2001, p. 269, § 19; Ga. L. 2003, p. 151,
§ 1; repealed by Ga. L. 2003, p. 517, § 29, effective July 1, 2003.
ARTICLE 9 VOTING MACHINES AND VOTE RECORDERS GENERALLY
Annotations
RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 25 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, § 25. 26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, § 309 et seq. Law reviews. For article, “SB 202: Revisions to Geor-
gia’s Election and Voting Procedures,” see 38 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 105 (2021).
PART 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS Cross references. Instruction of poll officers in use of voting machines and vote recorders, § 21-299.
Penalties for offenses relating to ballots and ballot cards, §§ 21-2-566 and 21-2574 et seq.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2009–2009 · leading case: Favorito v. Handel, 684 S.E.2d 257 (Ga. 2009).
Favorito v. Handel, 684 S.E.2d 257 (Ga. 2009). “Therefore, there is no merit in Appellants’ contention that they are entitled to mandamus relief for the purpose of compelling performance of duties set forth in former OCGA § 21-2-301 (b).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.