O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 21-2-301 (2019)

[Repealed] Pilot program; testing and evaluation of electronic voting systems; creation of Twenty-first Century Voting Commission

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

History

Code 1981, § 21-2-301, enacted by Ga. L. 2001, p. 269, § 19; Ga. L. 2003, p. 151,

§ 1; repealed by Ga. L. 2003, p. 517, § 29, effective July 1, 2003.

ARTICLE 9 VOTING MACHINES AND VOTE RECORDERS GENERALLY

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 25 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, § 25. 26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, § 309 et seq. Law reviews. For article, “SB 202: Revisions to Geor-

gia’s Election and Voting Procedures,” see 38 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 105 (2021).

PART 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS Cross references. Instruction of poll officers in use of voting machines and vote recorders, § 21-299.

Penalties for offenses relating to ballots and ballot cards, §§ 21-2-566 and 21-2574 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: Favorito v. Handel, 684 S.E.2d 257 (Ga. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Favorito v. Handel, 684 S.E.2d 257 (Ga. 2009). · cites it 4× “Therefore, there is no merit in Appellants’ contention that they are entitled to mandamus relief for the purpose of compelling performance of duties set forth in former OCGA § 21-2-301 (b).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.