O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 21-2-598 (2019)

Violations of chapter

✓ O.C.G.A.: 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as otherwise provided by law, any person who violates any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

History

Code 1981, § 21-2-598, enacted by Ga. L. 1998, p. 295, § 1.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 1998, p. 295, § 1, effective Janu-

ary 1, 1999, redesignated former Code Section 21-2-598 as present Code Section

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, § 477.

C.J.S. 29 C.J.S., Elections, § 608.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2022–2025 · leading case: Voter Participation Ctr. v. Raffensperger (N.D. Ga. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Voter Participation Ctr. v. Raffensperger (N.D. Ga. 2022). · cites it 2× “§§ 21-2-598, 21-2-562(a). VPC and CVI seek an injunction against the enforcement of the Prefilling Provision because they argue that it “restricts the content of [their] communications; interferes with their models for voter engagement, assistance, and association; and curtails…”
Voter Participation Ctr. v. Raffensperger (N.D. Ga. 2025). “§ 21-2-598. The Anti-Duplication Provision states that “[a]ll persons or entities .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.