O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 24-13-97 (2019)

Construction

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This article shall be interpreted and construed so as to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the laws of the states which enact it and shall be applicable only to such states as shall enact reciprocal powers to this state relative to the matter of securing attendance of witnesses as provided in this article.

History

Code 1981, § 24-13-97, enacted by Ga. L. 2011, p. 99, § 2/HB 24.

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 73 Am. Jur. 2d, Statutes, § 227 et seq.

C.J.S. 82 C.J.S., Statutes, § 505.

ARTICLE 5 UNIFORM INTERSTATE DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY ACT Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 2012, p. 651, § 2-1/HB 46, effective January 1, 2013, repealed the Code sections formerly codified at this article and enacted the current article. The former article consisted of Code Sections 24-13-110 through 24-13-112, relating to

the Uniform Foreign Depositions Act, and was based on Code 1981, §§ 24-13-110 - 24-13-112, enacted by Ga. L. 2011, p. 99, § 2/HB 24. Ga. L. 2012, p. 651, § 3-1(b)(1)/HB 46, not codified by the General Assembly, provides, in part, that this article shall apply

T.24, C.13, A.5 SECURING ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES

to subpoenas served on or after July 1, 2013, and in actions pending on or after July 1, 2013.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: Aburto v. State, 759 S.E.2d 276 (Ga. Ct. App. 2014).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Aburto v. State, 759 S.E.2d 276 (Ga. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “The provisions of former OCGA § 24-10-90 through OCGA § 24-10-97 are found at OCGA § 24-13-90 through OCGA § 24-13-97. See Young v. State, 324 Ga.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.