O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 24-6-652 (2019)

Qualified interpreters at agency proceedings

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The agency conducting any proceeding shall provide a qualified interpreter to the hearing impaired person:

(1) Whenever the hearing impaired person is a party to the proceeding or a witness before the proceeding; or

(2) Whenever a person who is below the age of 18 years is a party to the proceeding or a witness before the proceeding conducted by an agency whose parents are hearing impaired persons or whose guardian is a hearing impaired person.

(b) A hearing impaired person shall notify the agency not less than ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, prior to the date of the proceeding of the need for a qualified interpreter. If the hearing impaired person received notice of the proceeding less than ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, prior to the proceeding, such person shall notify the agency as soon as practicable after receiving such notice.

History

Code 1981, § 24-6-652, enacted by Ga. L. 2011, p. 99, § 2/HB 24.

Annotations

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Editor’s notes. - In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, opinions under former O.C.G.A. § 24-9-102 are included in the annotations for this Code section. Hearing impaired juror. - Subsec-

tion (a) of former O.C.G.A. § 24-9-102 did not require that a court provide an interpreter for a hearing impaired prospective juror. 1987 Op. Att’y Gen. No. U87-11 (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 24-9102).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Kevin Chad Hardy v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2022).
Kevin Chad Hardy v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 4× “Thus, under OCGA § 24-6-652 (a) (1), Georgia agencies — including courts — are required to “provide a qualified interpreter to [a] hearing impaired person .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.