O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 25-2-27 (2019)

Suspected arson investigation - Authority to take testimony and arrest; obligation to furnish information to district attorney

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The state fire marshal or his deputy, when in his opinion such proceedings are necessary, shall take the testimony on oath of all persons believed to be cognizant of or to have information or knowledge in relation to suspected arson and shall cause the testimony to be reduced to writing. If he is of the opinion that there is evidence sufficient to charge any person with the crime of arson, he shall cause such person to be arrested in accordance with the law. He shall also furnish the district attorney of the circuit in which the fire occurred with all the information obtained by him in his investigation. The district attorney shall thereupon proceed according to law.

History

Ga. L. 1949, p. 1057, § 21.

Annotations

Cross references. Arson and explosives generally, § 167-60 et seq. OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Powers not exclusive. - Grant to the state fire marshal and the marshal’s deputy of powers relating to investigation

of suspected arson, as set forth in O.C.G.A. § 25-2-27, is not exclusive. 1989 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 89-14.

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 5 Am. Jur. 2d, Arrest, §§ 1 et seq., 10 et seq., 31, 40. 5 Am. Jur. 2d, Arson and Related Offenses, § 31 et seq. C.J.S. 6A C.J.S., Arson, § 21 et seq.

ALR. Expert and opinion evidence as regards fire, 131 A.L.R. 1113. What constitutes “burning” to justify charge of arson, 28 A.L.R.4th 482.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Karen Diane Wynn Lyle v. Jerry D. Heath, Jr. (Ga. Ct. App. 2025).
Karen Diane Wynn Lyle v. Jerry D. Heath, Jr. (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “17 OCGA §§ 25-2-27, 28, 32, 32.1, 32.2, 33, 33.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.