O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 28-9-1 (2019)

Definitions

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this chapter, the term: (1) ‘‘Code’’ means the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, any unannotated version thereof, or any codification of the laws of the State of Georgia which is a successor to or replacement of such Code, and such term shall include all statutory provisions, annotations, research references, notes, indexes, tables, constitutions, cross-references, pocket parts, and other material related to or included in such Code. (2) ‘‘Commission’’ means the Code Revision Commission originally created pursuant to H.R. No. 217-838 adopted by the General Assembly at the 1977 regular session, as amended, and as re-created by Code Section 28-9-2.

History

(Code 1981, § 28-9-1, enacted by Ga. L. 1985, p. 197, § 1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2012–2013 · leading case: Rutter v. Rutter, 730 S.E.2d 626 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rutter v. Rutter, 730 S.E.2d 626 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “Legislative Counsel invites us to avoid altogether the question of repeal and to hold instead that the publication of subparagraph (2) (C) in the Official Code is dispositive of its validity, inasmuch as the Code Revision Commission has approved of its publication, see OCGA §…”
Rutter v. Rutter, 749 S.E.2d 657 (Ga. 2013). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 28-9-1 et seq. Thus, anyone looking to the Official Code of Georgia would naturally conclude that the curtilage exception was good law.”
Charles Rutter v. Stacy Rutter (Ga. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “4 Legislative Counsel invites us to avoid altogether the question of repeal and to hold instead that the publication of subparagraph (2) (C) in the Official Code is dispositive of its validity, inasmuch as the Code Revision Commission has approved of its publication, see OCGA §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.