O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 29-11-17 (2019)

Notice required; process for service

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) If a petition for the appointment of a guardian or issuance of a conservatorship order is brought in this state and this state was not the respondent’s home state on the date the petition was filed, in addition to complying with the notice requirements of this state, notice of the petition must be given to those persons that would be entitled to notice of the petition if a proceeding were brought in the respondent’s home state. The notice must be given in the same manner as notice is required to be given in this state.

(b) If compliance with the notice requirements under subsection (a) of this Code section would require personal service on any person outside this state, a court of competent jurisdiction in this state may order that such person be served by registered or certified mail or statutory overnight delivery, in the manner provided in subsection (e) of Code Section 29-9-4, or by a special process server, if the petitioner so requests in the petition or on the court’s own motion.

(c) If compliance with the notice requirements under subsection (a) of this Code section would require service on any person outside this state that is not sui juris, such person shall be served in a manner provided in subsection (d) of Code Section 29-9-4.

History

(Code 1981, § 29-11-17, enacted by Ga. L. 2016, p. 563, § 1/HB 954.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2020–2020 · leading case: In Re Est. of Kevin Lee Hanson (Ga. Ct. App. 2020).
In Re Est. of Kevin Lee Hanson (Ga. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 6× “Under Article 2 of the UAGCPJA — the “exclusive jurisdictional basis” for the type of order entered in this case, see OCGA § 29-11-11 — notice is governed by OCGA § 29-11-17. OCGA § 29-11-17 provides that notice in the present case must conform with the notice requirements of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.