O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 29-2-75 (2019)

Right of foreign guardian to bring action to enforce rights of minor

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A foreign guardian may institute an action in any court in this state to enforce any right or to recover any property belonging to the minor or accruing to the foreign guardian as such.

History

(Code 1981, § 29-2-75, enacted by Ga. L. 2004, p. 161, § 1.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Editor’s notes. - In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under Ga. L. 1850, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, p. 341 are included in the annotations for this Code section. Actions ex contractu and ex delicto not distinguished. - Georgia Laws 1850, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, p. 341 does not warrant distinction between actions ex contractu and actions ex delicto. Averitt v. Pope, 30 Ga. 660 (1860) (decided under Ga. L. 1850, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, p. 341).

Ward reaching majority during pendency of suit by nonresident guardian may be substituted as plaintiff in lieu of guardian. Sims ex rel. Talbot v. Renwick, 25 Ga. 38 (1858) (decided under Ga. L. 1850, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, p. 341). Cited in Ponder v. Foster, 23 Ga. 489 (1857); Goodwin v. Bowers, 169 Ga. 36, 149 S.E. 567 (1929); Burns v. Phillips, 50 F.R.D. 187 (N.D. Ga. 1970).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 39 Am. Jur. 2d, Guardian and Ward, § 217 et seq. Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms. - 13 Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Guardian and Ward, § 474 et seq.

C.J.S. - 39 C.J.S., Guardian and Ward, § 274 et seq. ALR. - Capacity of guardian to sue or to be sued outside state where appointed, 94 A.L.R.2d 162.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1996–1996 · leading case: In Re Est. of Donald, 474 S.E.2d 251 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Est. of Donald, 474 S.E.2d 251 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “3 OCGA § 29-2-75, not herein involved, provides for the appointment of a successor guardian in the event of the first guardian’s death.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.