O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 31-10-4 (2019)

Appointment of state registrar of vital records

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The commissioner shall appoint the state registrar of vital records, hereinafter referred to as ‘‘state registrar,’’ subject to the rules and regulations of the State Personnel Board, classified service.

History

Code 1933, § 88-1704, enacted by Ga. L. 1982, p. 723, § 1; Code 1981, § 31-10-4, enacted by Ga. L. 1982, p. 723, § 2; Ga. L. 2009, p. 745, § 2/SB 97; Ga. L. 2012, p. 446, § 2-41/HB 642.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. - Ga. L. 2012, p. 446, § 3-1/HB 642, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: ‘‘Personnel, equipment, and facilities that were assigned to the State Personnel Administration as of June 30, 2012, shall be trans-

ferred to the Department of Administrative Services on the effective date of this Act.’’ This Act became effective July 1, 2012. Ga. L. 2012, p. 446, § 3-2/HB 642, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: ‘‘Appropriations for functions which are transferred by this Act may be transferred as provided in Code Section 45-12-90.’’

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Porter v. Calhoun County, 250 Ga. 566, 300 S.E.2d 143 (1983).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1983–1983 · leading case: Porter v. Calhoun Cnty., 300 S.E.2d 143 (Ga. 1983).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Porter v. Calhoun Cnty., 300 S.E.2d 143 (Ga. 1983). · cites it 2× “Compare OCGA § 31-10-4 (Code Ann. § 88-1704), pursuant to which the Department’s commissioner appoints a state registrar of vital records, who is authorized under § 31-10-6 (a) (Code Ann.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.