Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Such written summary of charges shall be composed in a simple clear fashion so as to enable consumers to compare hospital charges and make cost-effective decisions in the purchase of hospital services.
(Code 1981, §31-7-11, enacted by Ga. L. 1983, p. 1307, § 1; Ga. L. 1984, p. 22, § 31.)
- Code Section 31-7-11 was added to the Code by both Ga. L. 1983, p. 1307, § 1 and Ga. L. 1984, p. 778, § 1. The former is set out above and the latter has been redesignated as Code Section 31-7-13 pursuant to the authority granted in Code Section 28-9-5.
- For article, "Price Transparency and Incomplete Contracts in Health Care," see 67 Emory L.J. 1 (2017).
- Under the rules of contract construction, O.C.G.A. § 31-7-11(a) became a part of the contract between a health care provider and two uninsured patients regarding payment for services rendered by the provider, and the parties were presumed to have contracted with reference to the statute and the statute's effect on the contracts; hence, these rules of contract construction enabled the trial court to conclude that the agreement in the contracts to pay for "all charges" unambiguously referred to the written summary of specific charges required by O.C.G.A. § 31-7-11(a) which established the price terms on which the parties intended to bind themselves. Morrell v. Wellstar Health Sys., Inc., 280 Ga. App. 1, 633 S.E.2d 68 (2006).
- Appellants' breach of contract claim was properly dismissed as appellants were free to avail themselves of the procedure established in O.C.G.A. § 31-7-11, allowing purchasers of hospital services to use the mandatorily available pricing information to compare hospital charges and to make cost-effective decisions; having agreed to pay a hospital corporation's fees and charges, appellants could not argue that the appellants agreed to something else. Satterfield v. S. Reg'l Health Sys., 280 Ga. App. 584, 634 S.E.2d 530 (2006).
Cited in Cox v. Athens Reg'l Med. Ctr., Inc., 279 Ga. App. 586, 631 S.E.2d 792 (2006).
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-06-15
Snippet: prevented her from utilizing the provisions of OCGA § 31-7-11 to make pre-treatment cost comparisons.3 She denied
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-06-15
Citation: 297 Ga. 285, 773 S.E.2d 692, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 436
Snippet: prevented her from utilizing the provisions of OCGA § 31-7-11 to make pre-treatment cost comparisons. 3