O.C.G.A.

31-9B-1 (2019)

Definitions

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this chapter, the term: (1) ‘‘Abortion’’ has the meaning provided by Code Section 31-9A-2. (2) ‘‘Medical emergency’’ has the meaning provided by Code Section 31-9A-2. (3) ‘‘Medically futile’’ means that, in reasonable medical judgment, the unborn child has a profound and irremediable congenital or chromosomal anomaly that is incompatible with sustaining life after birth. (4) ‘‘Physician’’ has the meaning provided by Code Section 31-9A-2. (5) ‘‘Probable gestational age of the unborn child’’ means what will, in reasonable medical judgment and with reasonable probability, be

the postfertilization age of the unborn child at the time the abortion is planned to be performed or induced, as dated from the time of fertilization of the human ovum. (6) ‘‘Reasonable medical judgment’’ means a medical judgment that would be made by a reasonably prudent physician, knowledgeable about the case and the treatment possibilities with respect to the medical conditions involved. (7) ‘‘Unborn child’’ has the meaning provided by Code Section

History

Code 1981, § 31-9B-1, enacted by Ga. L. 2012, p. 575, § 3/HB 954.

Annotations

Code Commission notes. - Pursuant

to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2012, the subsection (a) designation was removed as there was not a subsection (b).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Sovereign immunity barred suit. - Suit by physicians against state officials alleging that O.C.G.A. § 31-9B-1 et seq., regulating abortions, violated the state constitution in several respects, was barred by sovereign immunity under Ga.

Const. 1983, Art. I, Sec. II, Para. IX, because there was no consent to such a suit in any statute or in the state constitution. Lathrop v. Deal, 301 Ga. 408, 801 S.E.2d 867 (2017).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2017–2023 · leading case: Lathrop v. Deal, 801 S.E.2d 867 (Ga. 2017).
Lathrop v. Deal, 801 S.E.2d 867 (Ga. 2017). · cites it 2× “575, § 3 (codified at OCGA § 31-9B-1). This preexisting provision has been a part of our statutory law since 1973.”
State of Georgia v. Sistersong Women of Color Reproductive Just. Collective, 317 Ga. 528 (Ga. 2023). · cites it 4× “As used in this paragraph, the term “probable gestational age of the unborn child” has the meaning provided by Code Section 31-9B-1; or (3) A physician determines, in reasonable medical judgment, that the pregnancy is medically futile.”
Lathrop v. Deal, Governor (Ga. 2017). · cites it 2× “575, § 3 (codified at OCGA § 31-9B-1). 2 futile” or the abortion is necessary to “[a]vert the death of the pregnant woman,” “avert [a] serious risk of substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman,” or “[p]reserve the life of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.