O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 33-7-8.1 (2019)

Closing protection letters; definitions; premiums regarding such letters; maintenance of adequate reserves; rules and regulations

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) As used in this Code section, the term:

(1) ‘‘Closing protection letter’’ means insurance that indemnifies a buyer, lender, or seller in transactions where title to real estate is being conveyed solely against losses not to exceed the amount of the settlement funds only because of the following acts of the person responsible for the disbursement of settlement funds:

(A) Acts of fraud, theft, dishonesty, or negligence in handling settlement funds or documents in connection with a closing, but only to the extent that the acts affect status or priority of title in the real estate insured by the title insurance; and

(B) Failure to comply with written closing instructions by a proposed insured when agreed to by the title agency or title agent relating to title insurance coverage, but only to the extent that the acts affect status or priority of title in real estate insured by the title insurance.

(2) ‘‘Settlement funds’’ means the total funds paid by the buyer, lender, or seller as consideration for the conveyance of real estate.

(b) A title insurer may issue closing protection letters only for real estate transactions where its title insurance policies are issued and where its issuing agent or agency is also responsible for the disbursement of settlement funds.

(c) The premium charged by the title insurer for closing protection letters shall be filed with and approved by the Commissioner in accordance with Chapter 9 of this title and shall not be subject to any agreement requiring a division of the premium collected on behalf of the title insurer.

(d) Companies issuing closing protection letters shall maintain adequate reserves for those closing protection letters pursuant to Chapter 10 of this title.

(e) The Commissioner shall promulgate rules and regulations necessary to implement this Code section, which shall include, but shall not be limited to, prescribing standard closing protection letter policy forms.

History

Code 1981, § 33-7-8.1, enacted by Ga. L. 2012, p. 1077, § 2/SB 331; Ga. L. 2019, p. 337, § 1-37/SB 132.

The 2019 amendment, effective July 1, 2019, deleted ‘‘be authorized to’’ preceding ‘‘promulgate rules’’ in subsection (e).

Annotations

Effective date. - This Code section became effective May 2, 2012.

The 2019 amendment, effective July 1, 2019, deleted "be authorized to" preceding "promulgate rules" in subsection (e).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2021–2025 · leading case: Corevest Am. Fin. Lender LLC v. Stewart Title Guar. Co., 854 S.E.2d 381 (Ga. Ct. App. 2021).
Corevest Am. Fin. Lender LLC v. Stewart Title Guar. Co., 854 S.E.2d 381 (Ga. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 15× “” 2 This wording tracks the statutory language in OCGA § 33-7-8.1 (a) (1). 5 The loan closed a few weeks later.”
Corevest Am. Fin. Lender LLC v. Stewart Title Guar. Co., 854 S.E.2d 381 (Ga. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 15× “” 2 This wording tracks the statutory language in OCGA § 33-7-8.1 (a) (1). 5 The loan closed a few weeks later.”
Stewart Title Guar. Co. v. Groundfloor Holdings Ga, LLC, No. A24A1848 (Ga. Ct. App. Mar. 14, 2025). · cites it 2× “the Company issues or is contractually obligated to issue title insurance .”
First IC Bank v. North Am. Title Ins. Co., No. 21-10537 (11th Cir. Dec. 15, 2021). “” O.C.G.A. § 33-7-8.1. See also The Law of Closing Protection Letters, 36 TORT & INS.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.