O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 34-8-126 (2019)

Information or records available to parties to judicial or formal administrative proceedings

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Information or records deemed private and confidential under this chapter shall be available to parties to judicial or formal administrative proceedings only upon a finding by the presiding officer that the need for the information or records in the proceeding outweighs any reasons for the privacy and confidentiality of the information or records. Information or records deemed private and confidential under this chapter shall not be available in discovery proceedings unless the court in which the action has been filed has made the finding specified above. A judicial or administrative subpoena or order directed to the department must contain this finding. A subpoena for records or information held by the department may be directed to and served upon any employee of the department, but the department may specify by rule or regulation which employee shall produce the records or information in compliance with the subpoena.

History

(Code 1981, § 34-8-126, enacted by Ga. L. 1991, p. 139, § 1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: Oliver v. Coastal Reg'l Comm'n of Georgia (S.D. Ga. 2023).
Oliver v. Coastal Reg'l Comm'n of Georgia (S.D. Ga. 2023). · cites it 2× “O.C.G.A. § 34-8-126. I find the need for the information Plaintiff seeks greatly outweighs any reasons for privacy and confidentiality.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.