O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 34-8-152 (2019)

Standard rate

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The standard rate of contribution shall be 5.4 percent. The standard rate of contribution is the rate from which variations therefrom are computed as provided in Code Section 34-8-155. (b) No employer’s rate shall be reduced below the rate for new employers as specified in Code Section 34-8-151 for any calendar year, except as provided in Code Section 34-8-155, unless and until such

employer’s account could have been chargeable with benefit payments throughout the 36 consecutive calendar months ending on the computation date for that calendar year.

History

(Code 1981, § 34-8-152, enacted by Ga. L. 1991, p. 139, § 1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1986–1986 · leading case: Hollis v. Tanner, 341 S.E.2d 290 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hollis v. Tanner, 341 S.E.2d 290 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 7× “Her claim was denied on June 13, 1984, for the stated reason that she “performed services for a public or non-profit educational institution” and was consequently ineligible for benefits under OCGA § 34-8-152 (a). Simply stated, OCGA § 34-8-152 (a) bars payment of unemployment…”
Lamb v. Tanner, 344 S.E.2d 534 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “However, appellant argues that her violations of that policy resulted from her inability to perform her job duties proficiently rather than from conscious neglect on her part which would justify a disqualification for unemployment benefits under OCGA § 34-8-152 (2). We agree.…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.