O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 34-8-172 (2019)

Surety bond required of employee leasing company

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Commissioner shall require any employee leasing company, as defined in Code Section 34-8-32, to post a surety bond or such equivalent financial securities as approved by the Commissioner in such an amount as needed to cover the total of any potential tax liability which may reasonably be expected to be incurred by such employer. In the event an employee leasing company is unable to procure such bond or security, the employee leasing company may report such employees as being in the employment of its client employers, notwithstanding any provision of Code Section 34-8-32 to the contrary.

History

(Code 1981, § 34-8-172, enacted by Ga. L. 1991, p. 139, § 1.)

Annotations

Administrative rules and regulations. - Employee leasing companies, Official Compilation of the Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia, Georgia

Department of Labor, Employment Security Law, Requirements for Employees and Employers, § 300-2-7.07.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1986–1990 · leading case: Holstein v. North Chem. Co., 390 S.E.2d 910 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Holstein v. North Chem. Co., 390 S.E.2d 910 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 6× “In a determination óf when the decision of a hearing officer (appeals tribunal) becomes final, and the circumstances under which an appeal of such decision can be maintained, OCGA § 34-8-173 and OCGA § 34-8-172 (b), being in pari materia, must be construed to *547 gether.”

Swafford v. Tanner, 349 S.E.2d 498 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “154 (1) ( 220 SE2d 458 ) (1975), as well as any additional evidence the Board may then require pursuant to OCGA § 34-8-172 (b), and with the further direction that the Board “may modify its findings and decision by reason of the additional evidence and shall file that evidence…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.