O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 34-8-40 (2019)

Fund

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this chapter, the term "fund" means the Unemployment Compensation Fund which is established by Code Section 34-8-83 and from which all benefits provided under this chapter shall be paid.

History

(Code 1981, § 34-8-40, enacted by Ga. L. 1991, p. 139, § 1.)

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d. - 76 Am. Jur. 2d, Unemployment Compensation, § 14.

C.J.S. - 81 C.J.S., Social Security and Public Welfare, § 364.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1983–2012 · leading case: Vocational Placement Servs., Inc. v. Caldwell, 308 S.E.2d 618 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Vocational Placement Servs., Inc. v. Caldwell, 308 S.E.2d 618 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 12× “VPS appealed. A hearing officer found that Adkins was paid “wages” as provided in Code Ann.”
Stuart-James Co. v. Tanner, 380 S.E.2d 257 (Ga. 1989). · cites it 4× “1 When the Department of Labor attempted to assess unemployment taxes against it, Stuart-James sought to establish an exemption under OCGA § 34-8-40 (g) of the act, which exempts services performed by an individual for wages which meet the so-called “A, B, C” test.”
Tanner v. Brooks, 378 S.E.2d 405 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 14× “Accordingly, the only issue for determination is whether there was sufficient evidentiary support for the administrative finding that appellee was not exempt from the payment of unemployment com *229 pensation taxes under OCGA § 34-8-40 (g). OCGA § 34-8-40 (g) provides that…”
SKY KING 101, LLC v. Thurmond, 724 S.E.2d 412 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “228, 229 (1) ( 378 SE2d 405 ) (1989) (applying former OCGA § 34-8-40 (g)); Sarah Coventry, Inc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.