O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 34-9-412 (2019)

Insurance premium discount

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If an employer work organization implements a drug-free workplace program substantially in accordance with subsections (a) and (b) of Code Section 34-9-413, the employer work organization shall qualify for certification for a premium discount under such employer’s workers’ compensation insurance policy as provided in Code Section 33-9-40.2.

History

(Code 1981, § 34-9-412, enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 1512, § 2; Ga. L. 1997, p. 1581, § 4; Ga. L. 2001, p. 800, § 2.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Ivey, 250 Ga. App. 181, 549 S.E.2d 471 (2001).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1997–2001 · leading case: Georgia Pac. Corp. v. Ivey, 549 S.E.2d 471 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Georgia Pac. Corp. v. Ivey, 549 S.E.2d 471 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 10× “In these unemployment compensation appeals, we decide whether an employer must comply with the procedures set forth in *182 the drug-free workplace program statutes (OCGA § 34-9-412 et seq.) in order to prove just cause for discharging an employee.”
Georgia Self-Insurers Guar. Trust Fund v. Thomas, 501 S.E.2d 818 (Ga. 1998). · cites it 8× “There is no contention in this case that the employer failed to comply with OCGA § 34-9-415.”
Thomas v. Diamond Rug & Carpet Mills, 486 S.E.2d 664 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 34-9-412. OCGA § 34-9-413 requires a drug-free workplace program to contain various elements, including a written policy statement as provided in OCGA § 34-9-414 and substance abuse testing as provided in OCGA § 34-9-415.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.