O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 36-1-24 (2019)

Training classes for clerks of governing authority of county

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Any person hired or appointed to serve as the clerk of the governing authority of any county in this state shall attend and complete a course of training on matters pertaining to the basic performance of his or her official duties. Such training shall be conducted by the University of Georgia under the supervision of the Carl Vinson Institute of Government at such time and place as shall be determined by the Carl Vinson Institute of Government.

(b) The personnel of the Carl Vinson Institute of Government are authorized to work with the members of the Association County Clerks of Georgia and the Association County Commissioners of Georgia in establishing and operating the training course provided for in subsection (a) of this Code section, as well as establishing the rules and regulations governing attendance of such training.

(c) All reasonable expenses of attending the training class required by this Code section shall be paid from funds appropriated by the county governing authority for such purposes.

History

Code 1981, § 36-1-24, enacted by Ga. L. 1990, p. 1689, § 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1981–1981 · leading case: St. Regis Paper Co. v. Brown, 276 S.E.2d 568 (Ga. 1981).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

St. Regis Paper Co. v. Brown, 276 S.E.2d 568 (Ga. 1981). · cites it 2× “§ 36-1-24 . I submit that a legislative enactment similar to the one enacted by the West Virginia legislature is the only proper way to alter Georgia law on the matter currently before this court.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.