O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 36-71-11 (2019)

Intergovernmental agreements

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Municipalities and counties which are jointly affected by development are authorized to enter into intergovernmental agreements with each other, with authorities, or with the state for the purpose of developing joint plans for capital improvements or for the purpose of agreeing to collect and expend development impact fees for system improvements, or both, provided that such agreement complies with any applicable state laws.

History

Code 1981, § 36-71-11, enacted by Ga. L. 1990, p. 692, § 1.

Annotations

Law reviews. - For survey article on

real property law for the period from June 1, 2002 to May 31, 2003, see 55 Mercer L. Rev. 397 (2003).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2002–2002 · leading case: Cherokee Cnty. v. Greater Atlanta Homebuilders Ass'n, 566 S.E.2d 470 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cherokee Cnty. v. Greater Atlanta Homebuilders Ass'n, 566 S.E.2d 470 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 36-71-11. The Association has been careful not to challenge the constitutionality of the enabling statutes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.