O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 36-92-5 (2019)

Applicability

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall apply to all claims and causes of actions arising out of events occurring on or after January 1, 2005.

History

Code 1981, § 36-92-5, enacted by Ga. L. 2002, p. 579, § 3.

CHAPTER 93 INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS Sec. 36-93-1 through 36-93-26 [Repealed].

36-93-1 through 36-93-26.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. - Ga. L. 2007, p. 739, § 5/SB 200, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: ‘‘This Act shall only become effective on January 1, 2009, upon the ratification of a resolution at the November, 2008, state-wide general election that amends the Constitution so as to authorize the General Assembly to provide by general law for the creation and

comprehensive regulation of infrastructure development districts. If such resolution is not so ratified, this Act shall not become effective and shall stand repealed in its entirety on January 1, 2009.’’ The constitutional amendment proposed in Ga. L. 2007, p. 775/SR 309, was defeated in the general election on November 4, 2008.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2007–2013 · leading case: Weaver v. City of Statesboro, 653 S.E.2d 765 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Weaver v. City of Statesboro, 653 S.E.2d 765 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 4× “” OCGA § 36-92-5. The collision here occurred on September 29, 2003.”

Gwinnett Cnty. v. Sargent, 738 S.E.2d 716 (Ga. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “” OCGA § 36-92-5. The maximum waiver amount varies according to the date of the incident.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.