O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 37-3-44 (2019)

Giving person and representatives notice of their rights upon admission to emergency receiving facility

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Immediately upon arrival of a person at an emergency receiving facility under Code Section 37-3-43 or as soon thereafter as reasonably possible given a person’s condition or mental state at the time of arrival, the facility shall give the person written notice of his or her right to petition for a writ of habeas corpus or for a protective order under Code Section 37-3-148. This written notice shall also inform the person who has mental illness that he or she has a right to legal counsel and that, if the person is unable to afford counsel, the court will appoint counsel. (b) The notice informing the person’s representatives of such person’s hospitalization in an emergency receiving facility shall include a clear notification that the representatives may petition for a writ of habeas corpus or for a protective order under Code Section 37-3-148.

History

Code 1933, § 88-504.6, enacted by Ga. L. 1969, p. 505, § 1; Ga. L. 1978, p. 1789, § 1; Ga. L. 1986, p. 1098, § 2; Ga. L. 2016, p. 313, § 1/SB 271.

Annotations

Cross references. - Arrest of persons, T. 17, C. 4.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Precepts of due process require a clear and convincing standard of proof in a civil proceeding to commit an individual to a mental hospital involuntarily. Pitts v. State, 151 Ga. App. 691, 261 S.E.2d 435 (1979). Failure to give notice. - ‘‘Lawful’’ detention does not become ‘‘unlawful’’ by failure of a facility to provide a person

detained with the notices required by O.C.G.A. § 37-3-44, and the trial court erred in ruling that plaintiff had a viable claim for false imprisonment based upon such failure. Ridgeview Inst., Inc. v. Handley, 224 Ga. App. 533, 481 S.E.2d 531 (1997). Cited in Carter v. Landy, 163 Ga. App. 509, 295 S.E.2d 177 (1982).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Medical admissions county is was county in which the procedure was

governed by Ga. L. 1969, p. 505. 1972 Op. Att’y Gen. No. U72-29.

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. - Showing as to mental condition which will entitle one restrained on ground of insanity to release, 19 A.L.R. 715. May proceedings to have a person declared insane and to appoint a conservator or committee of his person or estate rest upon substituted or constructive service of process, 175 A.L.R. 1324.

Hospital’s liability as to diagnosis and care of patients brought to emergency ward, 72 A.L.R.2d 396. Necessity and sufficiency of statements informing one under investigation for involuntary commitment of right to remain silent, 23 A.L.R.4th 563.

T.37, C.3, A.3, P.2 TREATMENT, ETC., FOR MENTAL ILLNESS

PART 2 EVALUATING FACILITIES FOR EXAMINATION OF PERSONS ORDERED TO UNDERGO EVALUATION FOR MENTAL ILLNESS RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. Proof of Facts. - Adequacy of Quasi-Miranda Warning Prior to Involuntary Civil Commitment, 40 POF2d 733.

Wrongful Confinement to a Mental Health or Developmental Disabilities Facility, 44 POF3d 217.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1990–1997 · leading case: Ridgeview Inst., Inc. v. Handley, 481 S.E.2d 531 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997).
Ridgeview Inst., Inc. v. Handley, 481 S.E.2d 531 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 12× “The admitting nurse claims that Handley refused to sign other forms presented to him acknowledging his right to retain counsel and his right to seek a protective order or habeas corpus relief as required by OCGA § 37-3-44, but Handley claims he was never informed of these rights.”
Harvey v. Harvey, 749 F. Supp. 1118 (M.D. Ga. 1990). “§ 37-3-44. Court-ordered evaluations are also permitted upon application by any person, but a hearing must be held and notice given to the patient, who has a right to counsel.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.