O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 40-1-102 (2019)

Certificate or permit prerequisite to operation; minimum insurance requirement

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) No motor carrier of passengers or household goods shall, except as otherwise provided in this part, operate without first obtaining from the commissioner a certificate or permit. (b) Before a motor carrier may enter into any contract for the transportation of passengers, the motor carrier shall provide to all parties to the agreement a copy of the motor carrier’s proof of legally required minimum insurance coverage and a valid certification number demonstrating that the motor carrier is currently certified by the commissioner, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, or any other similarly required certifying agency. Any contract entered into in violation of this Code section shall be void and unenforceable.

History

Code 1981, § 40-1-102, enacted by Ga. L. 2012, p. 580, § 1/HB 865; Ga. L. 2013, p. 141, § 40/HB 79; Ga. L. 2013, p. 756, § 1/HB 255; Ga. L. 2013, p. 838, § 7/HB 323.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 2013, p. 141, § 54(f)/HB 79, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: “In the event of a conflict between a provision in Sections 1 through 53 of this Act and a provision of another

Act enacted at the 2013 regular session of the General Assembly, the provision of such other Act shall control over the conflicting provision in Sections 1 through 53 of this Act to the extent of the conflict.” Ga. L. 2013, p. 838, § 20/HB 323, not codified by the General Assembly, provides, in part: “This Act shall become effective on July 1, 2013, and shall apply to violations committed on or after such date.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2026–2026 · leading case: Donald E. Neal v. Metro Contents, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 2026).
Donald E. Neal v. Metro Contents, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 6× “” This matters because under OCGA § 40-1-102,32 “[a]ny contract entered into in violation of [the GMCA] shall be void and unenforceable.”
— 40-1-102(a) — 1 case
Donald E. Neal v. Metro Contents, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 2026). “” This matters because under OCGA § 40-1-102,32 “[a]ny contract entered into in violation of [the GMCA] shall be void and unenforceable.”
— 40-1-102(b) — 1 case
Donald E. Neal v. Metro Contents, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 2026). “” This matters because under OCGA § 40-1-102,32 “[a]ny contract entered into in violation of [the GMCA] shall be void and unenforceable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.