O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 40-6-225 (2019)

Parking places for persons with disabilities for the nonambulatory

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any business entity may elect to designate parking places for persons with disabilities for the nonambulatory. Such parking places for the nonambulatory shall be in addition to any parking places for persons with disabilities required by Chapter 3 of Title 30. Such parking places for the nonambulatory shall be clearly marked by a sign bearing the words ‘‘Parking for Persons with Disabilities - nonambulatory persons only.’’ Such parking places for the nonambulatory shall be utilized only for the purpose of allowing a nonambulatory permanently disabled person to enter or exit a vehicle while in such parking place. A vehicle in a parking place for the nonambulatory shall be required to have a valid unexpired parking permit for persons with disabilities or a specially designated license plate for disabled persons authorized under Code Section 40-2-74 or 40-2-74.1. For the purposes of this Code section,

the term ‘‘nonambulatory permanently disabled person’’ means a person who is permanently disabled as a result of the loss or loss of use of one or both legs and who is dependent upon crutches, a walker, or a wheelchair for locomotion.

History

(Code 1981, § 40-6-224.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1989, p. 572, § 1; Code 1981, § 40-6-225, as redesignated by Ga. L. 1990, p. 2048, § 5; Ga. L. 1995, p. 1302, § 8; Ga. L. 2006, p. 659, § 4/HB 1217; Ga. L. 2007, p. 47, § 40/SB 103.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1985–1985 · leading case: Burden v. State, 335 S.E.2d 304 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Burden v. State, 335 S.E.2d 304 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 4× “OCGA § 40-6-225 (f) (2). Accordingly, the State Court of Clayton County was an appropriate forum for the trial of this matter.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.