O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 42-6-5 (2019)

Temporary custody of inmate requesting disposition of pending indictment or accusation

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In response to the request of an inmate for final disposition of any pending indictment or accusation made pursuant to Code Section 42-6-3 or pursuant to an order of a court entered pursuant to subsection (a) of Code Section 24-13-60, the department shall offer to deliver temporary custody of the inmate to the sheriff or a deputy sheriff of the county in which the indictment or accusation is pending against the inmate. The judge of the court in which the proceedings are pending is authorized to and shall issue an ex parte order directed to the department requiring the delivery of the inmate to the sheriff or a deputy sheriff of the county in which the trial is to be held. (b) The sheriff or a deputy sheriff of a county accepting temporary custody of an inmate shall present proper identification and a certified copy of the indictment or accusation upon which trial is to be had. (c) If the sheriff or deputy sheriff fails or refuses to accept temporary custody of the inmate, detainers based upon indictments or accusations upon which trial has been sought shall be stricken and dismissed from the records of the department. (d) The temporary custody referred to in this article shall be only for the purpose of permitting prosecution on the pending indictments or accusations which form the basis of the detainer or detainers filed against the inmate. (e) At the earliest practicable time consonant with the purposes of this article, the inmate shall be returned by the sheriff or a deputy sheriff to the custody of the department. (f) During the continuance of temporary custody or while the inmate is otherwise being made available for trial as required by this article, the sentence being served by the inmate shall continue to run and good time shall be earned by the inmate to the same extent that the law allows for any other inmate serving under the jurisdiction of the department. (g) From the time that the sheriff or a deputy sheriff receives custody of an inmate pursuant to this article and until the inmate is returned to the physical custody of the department, the county to which the inmate is transported shall be responsible for the safekeeping of the inmate and shall pay all costs of transporting, caring for, keeping, and returning the inmate. Any habeas corpus action instituted by the inmate while in the custody of the sheriff shall be defended by the county attorney and the expenses of such litigation shall be paid by the county.

History

Ga. L. 1968, p. 1110, § 1; Ga. L. 1969, p. 606, § 1; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 42; Ga. L. 2011, p. 99, § 63/HB 24.

Annotations

Cross references. Demand for trial generally, § 17-7-170 et seq. Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 2011, p. 99, § 101/HB 24, not codified by the General Assembly, pro-

vides that this Act shall apply to any motion made or hearing or trial commenced on or after January 1, 2013. Law reviews. For article, “Evidence,” see 27 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 1 (2011). For article on the 2011 amendment of this Code section, see 28 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 1 (2011).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Computation of good-time allowances and deductions. - With the limited exception of this section relating to temporary custody of convicted inmates in county facilities, good-time allowances and deductions therefrom can only be computed when inmates are under the jurisdiction and control of the institutions

operated by the Department of Offender Rehabilitation (Corrections); moreover, with the limited exception of this section, neither sheriffs nor the department can take jail credit away from inmates who have misbehaved in jails prior to their being sent to correctional institutions. 1972 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 72-61.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1983–2001 · leading case: Brison v. State, 545 S.E.2d 345 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001).
Brison v. State, 545 S.E.2d 345 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “However, not only did Brison fail to move for a continuance, he filed a demand for a disposition of his accusation pursuant to OCGA § 42-6-5. Indeed, Brison never contended he was unprepared for trial until after the state cross-examined him.”
Westbrook v. Zant, 575 F. Supp. 186 (M.D. Ga. 1983). · cites it 4× “Finally, the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 42-6-5(g) are not relevant in this action.”
— 42-6-5(g) — 1 case
Westbrook v. Zant, 575 F. Supp. 186 (M.D. Ga. 1983). “Finally, the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 42-6-5(g) are not relevant in this action.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.