O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 43-11-16 (2019)

Liability for action of peer review committee or board

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No dentist licensed under this chapter and acting or serving on a peer review committee or board or hospital review committee shall be liable for damages for any action of such board or committee or for any official action taken or recommendation made as a member of such board or committee.

History

Code 1933, § 84-714.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1974, p. 532, § 2; Ga. L. 1976, p. 484, § 1.

Annotations

Cross references. Medical peer review groups generally, § 31-7-130 et seq.

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. Right of voluntary disclosure of privileged proceedings of hospital medical re-

view or doctor evaluation processes, 60 A.L.R.4th 1273.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2015–2015 · leading case: Goldstein, Garber & Salama, LLC v. J. B., 779 S.E.2d 484 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Goldstein, Garber & Salama, LLC v. J. B., 779 S.E.2d 484 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “11 See OCGA § 43-11-16 (providing actions to enjoin practice by unlicensed or unregistered barbers or cosmetologists, and containing the very same declaration that “the unlicensed activities referred to in this Code section are a menace and a nuisance dangerous to the public…”
Goldstein, Garber & Salama, LLC v. J. B. (Ga. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “11 See OCGA § 43-11-16 (providing actions to enjoin practice by unlicensed or unregistered barbers or cosmetologists, and containing the very same declaration that “the unlicensed activities referred to in this Code section are a menace and a nuisance dangerous to the public…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.