O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 43-2-1 (2019)
Legislative findings; purpose of chapter
✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The General Assembly finds that the effectiveness of many regulatory agencies which have been created in this state needs to be evaluated. It is the purpose of this chapter to establish a procedure for the review of regulatory agencies to increase their effectiveness and efficiency.
History
Code 1981, § 43-2-1, enacted by Ga. L. 1992, p. 3137, § 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2018–2018 · leading case: JORDAN v. MARRIOTT Int'l, INC. Marriott Int'l, Inc. v. Jordan., 816 S.E.2d 822 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).
JORDAN v. MARRIOTT Int'l, INC. Marriott Int'l, Inc. v. Jordan., 816 S.E.2d 822 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). “Under the innkeeper statutes, a person’s status as a guest at the hotel terminates at the expiration of the time period agreed to by the parties and “signed or initialed by the guest.”
Wendy Jordan v. Marriott Int'l, Inc, No. A18A0167 (Ga. Ct. App. July 12, 2018). “Under the innkeeper statutes, a person’s status as a guest at the hotel terminates at the expiration of the time period agreed to by the parties and “signed or initialed by the guest.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.