O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 43-2-1 (2019)

Legislative findings; purpose of chapter

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The General Assembly finds that the effectiveness of many regulatory agencies which have been created in this state needs to be evaluated. It is the purpose of this chapter to establish a procedure for the review of regulatory agencies to increase their effectiveness and efficiency.

History

Code 1981, § 43-2-1, enacted by Ga. L. 1992, p. 3137, § 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2018–2018 · leading case: JORDAN v. MARRIOTT Int'l, INC. Marriott Int'l, Inc. v. Jordan., 816 S.E.2d 822 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

JORDAN v. MARRIOTT Int'l, INC. Marriott Int'l, Inc. v. Jordan., 816 S.E.2d 822 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 4× “Under the innkeeper statutes, a person’s status as a guest at the hotel terminates at the expiration of the time period agreed to by the parties and “signed or initialed by the guest.”

Wendy Jordan v. Marriott Int'l, Inc a/k/a J.W. Marriott Atlanta Buckhead (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “Under the innkeeper statutes, a person’s status as a guest at the hotel terminates at the expiration of the time period agreed to by the parties and “signed or initialed by the guest.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.