O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 43-21-16 (2019)

[Repealed] Charging of excessive rates during 1996 Olympic Games; penalties; automatic repeal

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

History

Code 1981, § 43-21-16, enacted by Ga. L. 1994, p. 1364, § 1; repealed by Ga. L.

1994, p. 1364, § 1, effective December 31, 1996.

ARTICLE 2 SANITARY REGULATIONS FOR HOTELS AND INNS

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 2 Am. Jur. 2d, Administrative Law, § 21 et seq. 15A Am. Jur. 2d, Commerce, §§ 1 et seq., 90 et seq. 16A Am. Jur. 2d, Constitutional Law, §§ 266, 284 et seq., 332, 339 et seq. 39 Am. Jur. 2d, Health, §§ 1 et seq., 26 et seq. 51 Am. Jur. 2d, Licenses and Permits, § 1 et seq. 58 Am. Jur. 2d, Occupations, Trades and Professions, § 1 et seq. 63C Am. Jur. 2d, Public Officers and Employees, § 14 et seq. 72 Am. Jur. 2d, States, Territories and Dependencies, §§ 42, 64 et seq. 73 Am. Jur. 2d, Statutes, §§ 17 et seq., 58 et seq. C.J.S. 15 C.J.S., Commerce, §§ 9 et seq., 83 et

seq., 111 et seq. 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 280 et seq. 16A C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 580 et seq. 16B C.J.S., Constitutional Law, §§ 1055-1058, 14441448. 16D C.J.S., Constitutional Law, §§ 2085, 2086. 53 C.J.S., Licenses, § 6 et seq. 67 C.J.S., Officers and Public Employees, § 12 et seq. 73 C.J.S., Public Administrative Law and Procedure, § 50 et seq. 73 C.J.S., Public Administrative Law and Procedure, § 146 et seq. 81A C.J.S., States, § 120 et seq. 82 C.J.S., Statutes, §§ 203, 281.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1999–1999 · leading case: World Trade Bus., Inc. v. Amit, Inc., 521 S.E.2d 40 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999).
World Trade Bus., Inc. v. Amit, Inc., 521 S.E.2d 40 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 36× “World Trade contends the trial court erred by holding it had no standing under OCGA § 43-21-16 (“the Olympic Anti-Price Gouging Statute”), by denying summary judgment to World Trade and by refusing to hold that the contracts between World Trade and Comfort Inn violated the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.