O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 43-34-106 (2019)

(See Editor’s notes.) Posting notice that assistants are being utilized

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any physician, clinic, or hospital using a physician assistant shall post a notice to that effect in a prominent place.

History

Ga. L. 1972, p. 676, § 10; Ga. L. 2009, p. 859, § 1/HB 509.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. - For application of

this statute in 2020, see Executive Order 03.20.20.02.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Determination of medical tasks physician’s assistant eligible to perform. - Because it is a matter strictly for the Composite State Board of Medical Examiners (now Georgia Composite Medical Board) to determine the nature and scope of the medical tasks for which any physician’s assistant (PA) may be qualified to perform, the idea that any other entity can determine whether it is appro-

priate for a PA to perform any specific type of procedure, whether or not the procedure is contained within the PA’s job description, is contrary to the purposes and intent of O.C.G.A. T. 43, C. 34, A. 4. Cardio TVP Surgical Assocs., P.C. v. Gillis, 272 Ga. 404, 528 S.E.2d 785 (2000), reversing Gillis v. Cardio TVP Surgical Assocs., P.C., 239 Ga. App. 350, 520 S.E.2d 767 (1999).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1999–1999 · leading case: Gillis v. Cardio TVP Surgical Assocs., P.C., 520 S.E.2d 767 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999).
Gillis v. Cardio TVP Surgical Assocs., P.C., 520 S.E.2d 767 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 20× “OCGA § 43-34-106 mandates that "[a]ny physician, clinic, or hospital using a physician's assistant shall post a notice to that effect in a prominent place.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.