O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 43-38-13 (2019)
Arrest powers of licensees and registrants
✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Reserved. Repealed by Ga. L. 2021, p. 625, § 6/HB 479, effective May 10, 2021.
Annotations
Editor’s notes. - This Code section was based on Ga. L. 1973, p. 40, § 13; Ga. L. 1981, p. 1828, § 11. Ga. L. 2021, p. 625, § 8/HB 479, not codified by the General Assembly, provides, in part, that: ‘‘This Act shall not
apply to rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, or proceedings that were begun before the effective date of this Act.’’ This Act became effective May 10, 2021.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1985–1985 · leading case: De La Gonzalez v. Krystal Co., 327 S.E.2d 546 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985).
De La Gonzalez v. Krystal Co., 327 S.E.2d 546 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985). “OCGA §§ 43-38-13 and 17-4-60. It follows that Laney’s statement is therefore inadmissible to prove agency.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.