O.C.G.A.

43-39A-20 (2019)

Use of appraiser as disinterested third party for rendering unbiased valuation or analysis; ‘‘specialized services’’; contingent fees

✓ O.C.G.A.: 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A client or employer may retain or employ an appraiser to act as a disinterested third party in rendering an unbiased valuation or analysis. A client or employer may also retain or employ an appraiser to provide specialized services to facilitate the client’s or employer’s objectives. In either case, the appraisal and the appraisal report must comply with the provisions of this chapter.

(b) For the purposes of this chapter, the term ‘‘specialized services’’ as defined in Code Section 43-39A-2 means those appraisal services which do not fall within the definition of independent appraisal assignment. The term ‘‘specialized services’’ may include valuation work and analysis work. Regardless of the intention of the client or employer, if the appraiser would be perceived by third parties or the public as acting as a disinterested third party in rendering an unbiased analysis, opinion, or conclusion, the work is classified as an independent appraisal assignment and not ‘‘specialized services.’’

(c) An appraiser may not accept a fee for an independent appraisal assignment that is contingent upon the appraiser’s reporting a predetermined estimate, analysis, valuation, or opinion or is contingent upon the opinion, conclusion, analysis, or valuation reached or upon the consequences resulting from the independent appraisal assignment.

(d) An appraiser who enters into an agreement to perform specialized services may be paid a fixed fee or a fee that is contingent on the results achieved by the specialized services.

(e) If an appraiser enters into an agreement to perform specialized services for a contingent fee, this fact shall be clearly stated in each written and oral report. In each written report, this fact shall be clearly stated in a prominent location in such report, in each letter of transmittal, and in the certification statement made by the appraiser in such report.

(f ) Any appraiser who performs specialized services for which any other law requires licensure, certification, or registration must first obtain that licensure, certification, or registration before undertaking any such specialized services.

History

Code 1981, § 43-39A-20, enacted by Ga. L. 1990, p. 1701, § 1; Ga. L. 1992, p. 1402, § 1.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Stephens v. Trust for Pub. Land, 475 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (N.D. Ga. 2007).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2007–2007 · leading case: Stephens v. Trust for Pub. Land, 475 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (N.D. Ga. 2007).
Stephens v. Trust for Pub. Land, 475 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (N.D. Ga. 2007). · cites it 2× “Thus, the third appraiser serving in this capacity would not be retained to perform an independent valuation analysis, but rather only to “consider” the two appraisals previously obtained, and apply his knowledge, skill, and experience as an MAI appraiser to reconcile the two.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.