O.C.G.A.

43-39A-26 (2019)

Penalty

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person acting as an appraiser within the meaning of this chapter without an appraiser classification and any person who violates any other provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

History

Code 1981, § 43-39A-26, enacted by Ga. L. 1990, p. 1701, § 1; Ga. L. 1992, p. 1402, § 1.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Court testimony of out-of-state appraisers. - Individuals from out-of-state who testify as to the value of real estate under O.C.G.A. § 43-39A-24(b)(5) without

a Georgia appraisal classification do not violate O.C.G.A. § 43-39A-26. Leota Properties, Ltd. v. Bank One Lexington, 212 Ga. App. 508, 441 S.E.2d 920 (1994).

CHAPTER 40 REAL ESTATE BROKERS AND SALESPERSONS Sec.

Definitions. Creation of commission; members; meetings; recusal for conflict of interest; removal; compensation; annual report; budget unit. Determination of fees by commission.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1994–1994 · leading case: Leota Props., Ltd. v. Bank One Lexington, N.A., 441 S.E.2d 920 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Leota Props., Ltd. v. Bank One Lexington, N.A., 441 S.E.2d 920 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “Nor would one expect that a person could testify as to the value of real estate without first engaging in some preliminary process of valuation.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.