O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 43-41-11 (2019)

Effect of licensure

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The issuance of a license by the residential contractor or the general contractor division shall be evidence that the person named therein, including both the individual licensee and any business organization for whom such licensee is a qualifying agent, is entitled to all the rights and privileges of a licensed residential or general contractor while such license remains unrevoked or unexpired.

History

Code 1981, § 43-41-11, enacted by Ga. L. 2004, p. 786, § 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2020–2020 · leading case: Lfr Investments, LLC v. David Van Sant, 842 S.E.2d 574 (Ga. Ct. App. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lfr Investments, LLC v. David Van Sant, 842 S.E.2d 574 (Ga. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “5 Because we conclude that Reynaud is not properly considered a qualifying agent on LFR’s behalf, we similarly reject LFR’s argument that it is entitled to enforce the contract under OCGA § 43-41-11, which provides that “[t]he issuance of a license .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.