O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 44-2-39 (2019)

Adoption of rules and regulations; standardization

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The authority shall adopt rules and regulations and any standardized forms necessary to implement this part. (b) To promote uniform standards and practices and compatibility of technology used within offices of clerks of superior court in this state and recording offices in other states that have enacted or may enact provisions substantially similar to those contained within this part, the authority shall consider when adopting, amending, and repealing its rules and regulations and any standardized forms: (1) Standards and practices of other jurisdictions; (2) The most recent standards promulgated by national standard-setting bodies, such as the Property Records Industry Association; (3) The views of interested persons and governmental officials and entities; (4) The needs of counties of varying size, population, and resources; and (5) Standards that ensure that electronic documents are accurate, authentic, adequately preserved, and resistant to tampering.

History

(Code 1981, § 44-2-39, enacted by Ga. L. 2009, p. 695, § 1/HB 127.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2026–2026 · leading case: Hill-yisra'el (M.D. Ga. 2026).
Hill-yisra'el (M.D. Ga. 2026). · cites it 6× “§ 44-2-3913 do not violate the Fourth Amendment because there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the information in a motor vehicle record or 13 In the “Constitutional Challenges” section, Plaintiff lists O.”
— 44-2-39(b)(1) — 1 case
Hill-yisra'el (M.D. Ga. 2026). “§ 44-2-3913 do not violate the Fourth Amendment because there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the information in a motor vehicle record or 13 In the “Constitutional Challenges” section, Plaintiff lists O.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.