O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 45-3-30 (2019)

Officers commissioned under great seal of state

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The commissions of the following officers shall have annexed thereto the great seal of the state, and shall be signed by the Governor and countersigned by the Secretary of State, namely: senators and representatives in Congress; Justices of the Supreme Court; Judges of the Court of Appeals, superior courts, and juvenile courts; the Attorney General; district attorneys; reporters of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals; the Secretary of State; the Commissioner of Insurance; and all military officers of the grade of general. The commissions of all federal and judicial officers enumerated above shall be on parchment.

History

(Orig. Code 1863, § 129; Code 1868, § 124; Code 1873, § 133; Code 1882, § 133; Civil Code 1895, § 227; Civil Code 1910, § 262; Code 1933, § 89-201; Ga. L. 1984, p. 565, § 3; Ga. L. 1990, p. 8, § 45.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Jones v. Mills, 216 Ga. 616, 118 S.E.2d 484 (1961); Duncan v. Poythress, 657 F.2d 691 (5th Cir. 1981).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1994–1994 · leading case: Black v. Catoosa Cnty. Sch. Dist., 445 S.E.2d 340 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Black v. Catoosa Cnty. Sch. Dist., 445 S.E.2d 340 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “Even though the voters of Catoosa County have elected appellant Black by a majority vote and he has high respect as a law enforcement officer, it is the duty of the courts to abide by the laws which have been promulgated by the legislature.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.