O.C.G.A.
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
This article shall be known and may be cited as the "Natural Gas Competition and Deregulation Act."
History
(Code 1981, § 46-4-150, enacted by Ga. L. 1997, p. 798, § 4.)
Annotations
Law reviews. - For note on the 2002 enactment of this chapter, see 19 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 285 (2002).
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Natural gas company's certification application properly denied. - Georgia Public Service Commission was authorized to dismiss a natural gas company's application for certification because creation of a natural gas company as a Limited Liability Company (LLC) wholly owned by the city's utility board was in derogation of a city charter as the charter required the utility board to create a wholly owned subsidiary in the form of a non-profit corporation rather than a LLC; thus, the city's creation of a LLC was an ultra vires act. Infinite Energy v. Marietta Natural Gas, 349 Ga. App. 343, 826 S.E.2d 189 (2019).
Voluntary payment doctrine not applicable. - Trial court erred by dismissing a class action complaint under O.C.G.A. § 9-11-12(b)(6) for failure to state a cause of action in a suit brought by customers against an energy company seeking recovery of overpayments as the voluntary payment doctrine did not apply to bar the action. Ellison v. Southstar Energy Servs., LLC, 298 Ga. App. 170, 679 S.E.2d 750 (2009), aff'd, 286 Ga. 709, 691 S.E.2d 203 (2010).
Notes of Decisions
Southstar Energy Servs., LLC v. Ellison, 691 S.E.2d 203 (Ga. 2010).
· cites it 4× “Charles Ellison and Susan Bresler (Appellees) filed a class action against Southstar Energy Services, LLC d/b/a Georgia Natural Gas (Appellant), seeking to recover overpayments and other damages arising from Appellant's alleged violations of the Natural Gas Competition and…”
MXenergy Inc. v. Georgia Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 714 S.E.2d 132 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 4× “As a distribution company, Atlanta Gas Light does not sell natural gas directly to *631 customers, but provides the distribution system used by certified marketers to deliver gas to their customers. The marketers estimate how much gas their respective customers will use and then…”
Infinite Energy, Inc. v. Marietta Nat. Gas, LLC, 826 S.E.2d 189 (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 2× “1 See OCGA § 46-4-150 et seq. 2 At the time MNG filed the application with the PSC, the BLW had a contract with Gas South to act as the preferred gas marketer to the City of Marietta and its residents.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.