O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 46-4-150 (2019)

Short title

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This article shall be known and may be cited as the ‘‘Natural Gas Competition and Deregulation Act.’’

History

(Code 1981, § 46-4-150, enacted by Ga. L. 1997, p. 798, § 4.)

Annotations

Law reviews. - For note on the 2002 enactment of this chapter, see 19 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 285 (2002).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 2002–2019 · leading case: Southstar Energy Servs., LLC v. Ellison, 691 S.E.2d 203 (Ga. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Southstar Energy Servs., LLC v. Ellison, 691 S.E.2d 203 (Ga. 2010). · cites it 4× “Charles Ellison and Susan Bresler (Appellees) filed a class action against Southstar Energy Services, LLC d/b/a Georgia Natural Gas (Appellant), seeking to recover overpayments and other damages arising from Appellant's alleged violations of the Natural Gas Competition and…”

MXenergy Inc. v. Georgia Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 714 S.E.2d 132 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “As a distribution company, Atlanta Gas Light does not sell natural gas directly to *631 customers, but provides the distribution system used by certified marketers to deliver gas to their customers. The marketers estimate how much gas their respective customers will use and then…”

Infinite Energy, Inc. v. Georgia Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 572 S.E.2d 91 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “Baker, Attorney General, Robert S. Bomar, Deputy Attorney General, Daniel S.”

Ellison v. Southstar Energy Servs., LLC., 679 S.E.2d 750 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 4× “2d 368 (1986), the trial court did not err when it granted GNG's motion to dismiss.”

Infinite Energy, Inc. v. Marietta Nat. Gas, LLC, 826 S.E.2d 189 (Ga. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “1 See OCGA § 46-4-150 et seq. 2 At the time MNG filed the application with the PSC, the BLW had a contract with Gas South to act as the preferred gas marketer to the City of Marietta and its residents.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.