O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 49-1-1 (2019)
Definitions
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
As used in this title, the term:
(1) “Board” means the Board of Human Services.
(2) “Commissioner” means the commissioner of human services.
(3) “County board” means a county or district board of family and children services.
(4) “County department” means a county or district department of family and children services.
(5) “County director” means the director of a county or district department of family and children services.
(6) “Department” means the Department of Human Services.
History
Ga. L. 1937, p. 355, § 1; Ga. L. 1960, p. 85, § 1; Ga. L. 1963, p. 218, § 1; Ga. L.
1972, p. 1015, §§ 1201, 1203, 1204, 1215; Ga. L. 2009, p. 453, § 2-1/HB 228.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2025 · leading case: Floyd Cnty. Grand Jury v. Dep't of Fam. & Child. Servs., 463 S.E.2d 519 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995).
Floyd Cnty. Grand Jury v. Dep't of Fam. & Child. Servs., 463 S.E.2d 519 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995). “” The appellant contends that the plain meaning of the terms used in OCGA § 15-12-71 (b) (2) and in the statutes creating and defining county departments of family and children services (OCGA §§ 49-1-1; 49-3-1), along with the county’s annual financial contribution to DFACS and…”
Patrick Schuman v. Georgia Dep't of Human Servs., Div. of Fam. & Child. Servs. (Ga. Ct. App. 2020). “OCGA § 49-1-1. Once the appropriate DFACS office receives an 1 The 2018 version of OCGA § 49-5-180 et seq.”
In the Interest of M. R., a Child v. N/A (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). “See OCGA § 49-1-1 (6) (defining “department” as the Department of Human Services).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.