O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 5-6-7 (2019)

No decisions to be rendered ore tenus; publication of judgments and opinions

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No decision shall be rendered ore tenus. The reporter shall publish in the official reports of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals all judgments, but only those opinions which the courts shall direct to be published.

History

(Ga. L. 1866, p. 46, § 5; Code 1868, § 4210; Code 1873, § 4270; Code 1882, § 4270; Civil Code 1895, § 5583; Civil Code 1910, § 6202; Code 1933, § 6-1606; Ga. L. 1966, p. 493, § 9.)

Annotations

Cross references. - Motions for rehearing, Rules of the Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia, Rule 48.

Law reviews. - For article, ‘‘1966 Amendments to the Appellate Procedure Act of 1965,’’ see 2 Ga. St. B.J. 433 (1966).

For comment discussing the operation of stare decisis, in light of Walton v. Benton, 191 Ga. 548, 13 S.E.2d 185 (1941), see 3 Ga. B.J. 62 (1941).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Rayle v. Bennet, 173 Ga. 897, 162 S.E. 267 (1931); Trammell v. Atlanta Coach Co., 51 Ga. App. 705, 181 S.E. 315

(1935); Smith v. State, 196 Ga. 595, 27 S.E.2d 369 (1943).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1993–1993 · leading case: Georgia Mental Health Inst. v. Brady, 436 S.E.2d 219 (Ga. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Georgia Mental Health Inst. v. Brady, 436 S.E.2d 219 (Ga. 1993). · cites it 4× “S93A0976, GMHI contends that Brady was not entitled to habeas corpus and injunctive relief, first, because, contrary to the superior court's ruling, GMHI did have the right to appeal under §§ 5-3-2 and 5-3-3, and, second, because GMHI's notice of appeal entitled it to detain…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.