Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1964, p. 338, § 3; Ga. L. 1965, p. 283, § 5.)
- For article, "Researching Georgia Law," see 34 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 741 (2015).
- Although Women, Infants, and Children Program vendor handbook was subject to the publication and inspection requirements of O.C.G.A. § 50-13-3(a), as defendants all had actual knowledge of the rules and regulations in question, these rules and regulations were valid and effective against the defendants, despite the lack of required publication by the Department of Human Resources. So v. Ledbetter, 209 Ga. App. 666, 434 S.E.2d 517 (1993).
- Forensic Sciences Division of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation is exempt under O.C.G.A. § 35-3-155 from the requirement of O.C.G.A. § 50-13-3(b) that it publish its rules for granting permits for the administration of breath, blood, and urine tests. State v. Bowen, 274 Ga. 1, 547 S.E.2d 286 (2001).
- Standard Operating Procedures for urinalysis testing of the Division of Forensic Sciences of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation satisfied the requirements regarding adoption and publication of rules under O.C.G.A. § 50-13-3. State v. Cooper, 229 Ga. App. 97, 493 S.E.2d 1 (1997).
Cited in Cullers v. Home Credit Co., 130 Ga. App. 441, 203 S.E.2d 544 (1973); Georgia State Bd. of Dental Exmrs. v. Daniels, 137 Ga. App. 706, 224 S.E.2d 820 (1976); Mowery v. State, 234 Ga. App. 801, 507 S.E.2d 821 (1998); Olvera v. Univ. Sys. of Georgia's Bd. of Regents, 298 Ga. 425, 782 S.E.2d 436 (2016).
- 2 Am. Jur. 2d, Administrative Law, § 193.
- 73 C.J.S., Public Administrative Law and Procedure, §§ 161 et seq., 192, 196, 204.
- Model State Administrative Procedure Act (U.L.A.) § 3-101 et seq.
- What constitutes preliminary drafts or notes provided by or for state or local governmental agency, or intra-agency memorandums, exempt from disclosure or inspection under state freedom of information acts, 26 A.L.R.4th 639.
Total Results: 5
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-02-01
Citation: 298 Ga. 425, 782 S.E.2d 436, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 110
Snippet: procedural requirements of the APApursuant to OCGA §§ 50-13-3 and 50-13-4,] not a “rule” [subject to theAPA]
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-11-21
Citation: 654 S.E.2d 127, 282 Ga. 707, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 3588, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 851
Snippet: the one filed by the Wesley Foundation. OCGA § 50-13-3 (a) (2); see Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. 183-1-6-.03 to
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2001-06-04
Citation: 274 Ga. 1, 547 S.E.2d 286
Snippet: trial court concluded was required under OCGA § 50-13-3 (b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1986-11-05
Citation: 353 S.E.2d 195, 256 Ga. 709
Snippet: procedural requirements of the APA, see OCGA §§ 50-13-3 and 50-13-4, and was not an "agency rule" within
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1986-03-04
Citation: 340 S.E.2d 591, 255 Ga. 649, 1986 Ga. LEXIS 581
Snippet: arising from violations of OCGA §§ 48-2-6 and 50-13-3 by employees of the Department of Revenue. Keohler