O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

50-13A-2 (2019)

Role of agency

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The General Assembly finds that there is a need for an independent specialized agency separate and apart from the Department of Revenue to resolve disputes between the department and taxpayers in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Such an agency would: (1) Improve the utilization of judicial resources by resolving tax cases in a more streamlined and efficient manner; (2) Increase the uniformity of decision making in tax cases; (3) Improve the equal access of all parties to court process; and (4) Increase public confidence in the fairness of the state tax system.

History

Code 1981, § 50-13A-2, enacted by Ga. L. 2012, p. 318, § 15/HB 100.

Annotations

Law reviews. - For article, ‘‘Office of State Administrative Services: 20 Years of

Continuous Progress in Becoming One of the Leading Administrative Courts in the Nation,’’ see 21 Ga. St. Bar. J. 16 (Oct. 2015).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2016–2022 · leading case: Inglett & Stubbs Int'l, Ltd. v. Riley, 791 S.E.2d 642 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Inglett & Stubbs Int'l, Ltd. v. Riley, 791 S.E.2d 642 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “” OCGA § 50-13A-2. See also OCGA §§ 50-13A-1 (“This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the ‘Georgia Tax Tribunal Act of 2012.”
Moosa Co., LLC v. Comm'r of the Georgia Dep't of Revenue (Ga. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 6× “” OCGA § 50-13A-2. The Tribunal is “an independent and autonomous division within the Office of State Administrative Hearings operating under the sole direction of the chief tribunal judge.”
Funvestment Grp., LLC v. Robyn A. Crittenden, in Her Off. Capacity as Comm'r of the Georgia Dep't of Revenue (Ga. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “” OCGA § 50-13A-2. See also OCGA §§ 50-13A-1 (“This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the ‘Georgia Tax Tribunal Act of 2012.”
T-Mobile South, LLC v. Robyn A. Crittenden, in Her Off. Capacity as Comm'r of the Georgia Dep't of Revenue (Ga. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “” OCGA § 50-13A-2. The Tribunal is “an independent and autonomous division within the Office of State Administrative Hearings operating under the sole direction of the chief tribunal judge.”
Inglett & Stubbs Int'l, Ltd. v. Lynnette T. Riley, Comm'r of Georgia Dep't of Revenue (Ga. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “” OCGA § 50-13A-2. See also OCGA §§ 50-13A-1 (“This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the ‘Georgia Tax Tribunal Act of 2012.”
Georgia Gov't Transparency & Campaign Fin. Comm'n v. New Georgia Proj. Action Fund (Ga. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “Thus, while “proceedings before the agency” can be understood to OCGA § 50-13A-2. See OCGA § 50-13A-1 et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.