O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 50-18-90 (2019)

Short title

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This article shall be known and may be cited as the ‘‘Georgia Records Act.’’

History

Ga. L. 1972, p. 1267, § 1.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Griffin Indus. v. Ga. Dep’t of Agric., 313 Ga. App. 69, 720 S.E.2d 212 (2011).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2023 · leading case: Phillips v. State, 604 S.E.2d 520 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Phillips v. State, 604 S.E.2d 520 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “6 We take this opportunity to remind trial courts, clerks of court, law enforcement agencies, and other records’ custodians across the state of their important statutory duties regarding preservation of evidence.”

Sohail N. Butt v. Brian P. Kemp, in His Off. Capacity as Governor of the State of Georgia (Ga. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “7 Butt also asserted a claim under the Georgia Records Act, OCGA § 50-18-90 et seq., and the trial court dismissed this claim, too, but on different grounds.”

Griffin Indus., Inc. v. Georgia Dep't of Agric., 720 S.E.2d 212 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “15 Griffin argues that the Department’s failure to establish a record retention policy as required by the Georgia Records Act (“GRA”), OCGA § 50-18-90 et seq., demanded the denial of summary judgment to the Department.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.