O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 50-21-32 (2019)

Signing of pleadings, motions, or other papers

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In any claim, action, or proceeding brought under this article, the signature of an attorney or party constitutes a certificate by him or her that he or she has read the pleading, motion, or other paper; that to the best of his or her knowledge, information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry it is well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law; and that it is not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation. If a pleading, motion, or other paper is not signed, it shall be stricken unless it is signed promptly after the omission is called to the attention of the pleader or movant. If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed in violation of this Code section, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, shall impose upon the person who signed it, a represented party, or both an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or parties the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred because of the filing of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including reasonable attorneys’ fees.

History

Code 1981, § 50-21-32, enacted by Ga. L. 1992, p. 1883, § 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: Georgia Dep't of Corr. v. Couch, 759 S.E.2d 804 (Ga. 2014).
Georgia Dep't of Corr. v. Couch, 759 S.E.2d 804 (Ga. 2014). · cites it 8× “9 The Department points out that the GTCA includes a provision expressly providing for an award of attorney fees for improper litigation conduct, see OCGA § 50-21-32, 10 and contends that this demonstrates that the General Assembly meant to exclude other similar attorney fees…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.