O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 7-1-1020 (2019)

Construction

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Nothing in this article shall limit any statutory or common law right of any person to bring any action in any court for any act involved in the mortgage business or the right of the state to punish any person for any violation of any law. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, nothing in this article shall be construed as limiting in any manner the application of Part 2 of Article 15 of Chapter 1 of Title 10, the “Fair Business Practices Act of 1975.”

History

Code 1981, § 7-1-1020, enacted by Ga.

L. 1993, p. 543, § 1; Ga. L. 2009, p. 252, § 1/HB 312.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2002–2002 · leading case: Taylor v. Jacques (In Re Taylor), 292 B.R. 434 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Taylor v. Jacques (In Re Taylor), 292 B.R. 434 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2002). · cites it 11× “At the hearing, the Court asked counsel to consider the significance of Ga. Code Ann. § 7-1-1020 , which is a section of the Georgia law governing the state licensing of mortgage brokers that provides that nothing in the statute should be construed as limiting in any manner the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.