O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 8-3-223 (2019)

Compliance with federal law

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Compliance with the provisions of the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (Pub. L. No. 100-430) shall be deemed compliance with the provisions of paragraph (7) of Code Section 8-3-201 and subparagraph (a)(7)(B) of Code Section 8-3-202. In addition, should any provision of this article relating to the treatment of persons with disabilities be in conflict with any provision of the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, then the provisions of the latter shall prevail.

History

Code 1981, § 8-3-223, enacted by Ga. L.

1990, p. 1284, § 1; Ga. L. 1995, p. 1302, § 3.

ARTICLE 5 HOUSING TRUST FUND FOR THE HOMELESS Administrative rules and regulations. Organization and Definitions, Official Compilation of the Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia, State Housing Trust Fund for the Homeless, Rule 286-1-.01 et seq.

Application and Financial Assistance, Official Compilation of the Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia, State Housing Trust Fund for the Homeless, Rule 286-2-.01 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: Woda Cooper Dev. Inc v. City of Warner Robins Georgia (M.D. Ga. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Woda Cooper Dev. Inc v. City of Warner Robins Georgia (M.D. Ga. 2023). · cites it 2× “The City moves for summary judgment on the plaintiffs’ disparate treatment and retaliation claims.3 1 “Plaintiffs,” as used in this Order, generally refers to all four plaintiffs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.