O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 9-11-112 (2019)

Form of complaint for specific performance of contract to convey land

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

IN THE __________ COURT OF __________ COUNTY

STATE OF GEORGIA A.B., ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) Civil action ) File no. __________ C.D., ) (Clerk will insert Defendant ) number.)

COMPLAINT The defendant C.D., herein named, is a resident of __________ (street), __________ (city), __________ County, Georgia, and is subject to the jurisdiction of this court.

1.

On or about December 1, 1966, plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement in writing, a copy of which is hereto annexed as Exhibit A.

2.

In accordance with said agreement, plaintiff tendered to defendant the purchase price and requested a conveyance of the land, but defendant refused to accept the tender and refused to make the conveyance.

3.

Plaintiff now offers to pay the purchase price.

Wherefore, plaintiff demands:

(1) That defendant be required specifically to perform said agreement,

(2) Damages in the sum of $1,000.00, and

(3) That, if specific performance is not granted, plaintiff have judgment against defendant in the sum of $10,000.00.

__________________________________ Attorney for plaintiff __________________________________ Address

History

(Ga. L. 1966, p. 609, § 112; Ga. L. 1980, p. 649, § 10.)

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d. - 61A Am. Jur. 2d, Pleading, § 31 et seq.

C.J.S. - 71 C.J.S., Pleading, § 43 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1998–1998 · leading case: Head v. Hastings, 509 S.E.2d 616 (Ga. 1998).
Head v. Hastings, 509 S.E.2d 616 (Ga. 1998). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 9-11-112. See also OCGA § 9-11-8 (a) (2); Coleman v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.