O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 9-11-84 (2019)

Forms

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The forms contained in Code Sections 9-11-101 through 9-11-132 are sufficient under this chapter and are intended to indicate the simplicity and brevity of statement which this chapter contemplates.

History

(Ga. L. 1966, p. 609, § 84; Ga. L. 1967, p. 226, § 49.)

Annotations

U.S. Code. - For provisions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 84, see 28 U.S.C.

Law reviews. - For article advocating specialized pleadings and procedures to meet needs of juvenile court practice, see 23 Mercer L. Rev. 341 (1972).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Prayer for process not prerequisite to valid service. - Civil Practice Act (see now O.C.G.A. Ch. 11, T. 9) contains no requirement that a prayer for process be included in the complaint as a prerequisite to valid service of process. Matthews v. Fayette County, 233 Ga. 220, 210 S.E.2d 758 (1974).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S. - 35A C.J.S., Federal Civil Procedure, §§ 13, 279, 301 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: Dalziel Dalzeal LLC v. Dickinson Wright PLLC, No. 22-10625 (11th Cir. Feb. 7, 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dalziel Dalzeal LLC v. Dickinson Wright PLLC, No. 22-10625 (11th Cir. Feb. 7, 2024). · cites it 2× “As to his remaining claims, Plaintiff argues that: (1) he has sufficiently stated a claim against Dickinson Wright for open ac- count and account stated pursuant to the requirements of O.C.G.A. §§ 9-11-84 and 9-11-104 and (2) the allegations in the com- plaint, taken as true and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.