O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 9-9-20 (2019)

Short title; statement of purpose

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) This part shall be known and may be cited as the “Georgia International Commercial Arbitration Code.” (b) The purpose of this part is to encourage international commercial arbitration in this state, to enforce arbitration agreements and arbitration awards, to facilitate prompt and efficient arbitration proceedings consistent with this part, and to provide a conducive environment for international business and trade.

History

Code 1981, § 9-9-20, enacted by Ga. L. 2012, p. 961, § 1/SB 383.

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms. 2A Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Arbitration and Award, § 81. Am. Jur. 2d. 4 Am. Jur. 2d, Alternative Dispute Resolution, § 1.

ALR. Refusal to enforce foreign arbitration awards on public policy grounds, 144 A.L.R. Fed. 481.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2017–2017 · leading case: SCL Basilisk AG v. Agribusiness United Savannah Logistics LLC, 875 F.3d 609 (11th Cir. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
SCL Basilisk AG v. Agribusiness United Savannah Logistics LLC, 875 F.3d 609 (11th Cir. 2017). · cites it 3× “21 See Ga. Code Ann. § 9-9-20 (a) (“This part shall be known and may be cited as the ‘Georgia International Commercial Arbitration Code.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.