O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 9-9-30 (2019)

Interim measures of protection

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Before or during arbitral proceedings, a party may request from a court an interim measure of protection, and a court may grant such measure, and such request shall not be deemed to be incompatible with an arbitration agreement.

History

Code 1981, § 9-9-30, enacted by Ga. L. 2012, p. 961, § 1/SB 383.

Annotations

Law reviews. For annual review of admiralty law, see 69 Mercer L. Rev. 1001 (2018).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Authority of court. - O.C.G.A. § 99-30 did not authorize the court to order a charterer and a guarantor to provide security to ship owners pending an arbitration in London as § 9-9-30 does not authorize the creation of interim measures of protection but instead guarantees that resort to a court for interim measures will

not waive the right to arbitrate; the fact that O.C.G.A. § 9-9-38 uses “interim measures” in describing an arbitrator’s authority does not mean that the same authority is granted to the courts. SCL Basilisk AG v. Agribusiness United Savannah Logistics LLC, 875 F.3d 609, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22801 (11th Cir. 2017).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2017–2017 · leading case: SCL Basilisk AG v. Agribusiness United Savannah Logistics LLC, 875 F.3d 609 (11th Cir. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
SCL Basilisk AG v. Agribusiness United Savannah Logistics LLC, 875 F.3d 609 (11th Cir. 2017). · cites it 5× “3 Case: 16-15535 Date Filed: 11/14/2017 Page: 4 of 30 On June 24, 2016, SCL Basilisk filed a “Petition and Application for an Order for Security in Aid of Foreign Arbitration Pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 9-9-30” in the federal district court in Savannah, Georgia.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.